Perhaps the most difficult thing of all is to manage to put into simple words an extremely complex situation, and it is obvious that I can’t manage doing this at that very moment, reason why my mind does constantly shift from one thing to the other as if lacking of general ordering concepts.

Proof for the fact that poor intuition, in order to keep balances, has to take enormous weights on its shoulders.

Time helps and to look back has the advantage that work done in the meantime helps to find the proper concepts for general situations.

I would thus say that: becoming aware from Avanos to Cyprus of the fact that an attack on neurons produces as side effect that different functions of mind such as fantasy, future projects, imaginations and illusions get the same epithete of  ‘reality’ than empirical awareness, I simply decide that everything is nothing but a pure hypothesis. Suspended, whatever appears to the mind can’t mislead it to hold for real what is not. At the same time, I decide that even lies are related to reality in ’some way’ so that it should become possible to establish a link to reality through the working out of  a linking logic.

As empirical reality in its immediate awareness disappears progressively and even almost completely around 1996, the concept ‘real’ is attached to inner reality through its appearance and not through its contents. I can say that ‘I think, I feel, I construct, I deduce this and that’ is real without giving any kind of importance to the contents as not having the means to verify.

It looks as if the solution intuitively grasped in 1992 implied the possibility of a complete restoration of health inside of a more general principle ordering reality that was ‘to write a book’ in order not to get confused by the almost chaotic amount of worked out impressions that overflow the mind. Whatever is thought, worked out, built up, is possible material for that work, which in general keeps itself inside of patterns determining the nature of my work before.

As  a few rational functions do never get lost, as the grasping in essence, I have quickly built up a theory of soul that deals with psychic interactions inside of what I call compounds. To give an example of the type of reality this results into: if a ‘normal’ person does retain acertain number of outer characteristics in order to evaluate a person and react inside of a situation (way of dressing, car, sports an hobbies, place you encounter the person, etc) I will absorb intuitively the ‘effect’ of this presence on my mind and code this impression in brackets saying ‘a has produced this imagination, story, reaction’, etc. and depending on what this is about, it will condition a reaction. Very soon, this will form ‘blocks’: this story arising from a has common points with a story derived of b, etc. Common features build up a synthesized story that forms a category and in general it can be said that after a while, most general categories are studied in their interaction with each other.

The way back to health implied a moment of verification (2003) when the ’stories’ had to be put into  a certain context in order to establish the relationship to empirical reality and thus gain back not only empirical awareness, but also the rational link between both.

I would state not later than 1995, that these ‘compounds’ interact even in outer reality in such ways that it is possible to interact with it even without physical presence (compound Schizafon, or compound Telalim, etc.) Schizafon has left a story as well as Telalim, Egypt, the University. These form notions that are coded in ‘lines’ and these lines interact with reality somehow. I state about then that it must be possible to think a uniformed psychic fabric that is communicating people one to the other, somehow.

Inside of this ‘net’, I’m searching for those who were at the origin of both attacks and finish by developping an over all strategy against those who were, without being specifically aware of how this moves outer reality at the same time, as in my mind, both are clearly separated.

I continue at the same time my work on psychopathetic lines and on happenings concerning second world war. The first is based on a theory saying that psychopaths interact through coded lines with their victims inside of general logics that determine their appearance and the nature of their victims. The second is collecting information of the general unconscious trying to determine the logics of interaction. As underlying draft for all these investigations I use a hypothesis saying that: it must be possible to find the fundamental psychopathetic logic leading to second world war, as obviously psychopathetic, and that it can be said that a logic affecting a singular individual can be transferred to a national whole if it is true that this psychic fabric exists and is determined by a structure of understanding in common with many (Freud’s theory of the general unconscious). Inside of this pattern I tend to seek for formal structures at the origin of an attack and not for individuals: it’s the ‘nature’ of the attack that has a logic inherent and this logic affects a certain number of individuals that are ordered in a determined way.

I’m moving inside of a pattern that is attaching concepts generally used to order outer reality for inner activity as given more generally image in women’s activity: the appointment to have coffee at 4 becomes an important business meeting or an ‘assembly’, and influence a ’sign of power’ on those influenced, etc. this allowing a very quick and easy transfer of abtsract and logical concepts to theorize the structuring of soul as such in categories, forms, etc.

This is the pattern of the matter of the book to write: a ‘psychic’ claim based on tradition, or a fairy tale, or whatever is transfered to a political environment in concept without this ever leaving its actual realm. I’m the axe of transfer because I’m moving inside of this logic (servant of the Queen of Sabah).

Actually it is impossible to deal with reality as if it were all a pure hypothesis: extremely strong moral patterns determine reactions as there are no outer formal references left. Thus: to ‘intuition’ ordered inside of this ’story’ that allows the grasping of an essence that allows the building up of categories, the fundamental axe of reaction is the one that is determining the matter of the book to come: a duel as means to establish who is right and who is wrong.

Apparently, I would judge now, the fact that I don’t allow the fusion of impressions, saying: this has happened inside of a general Russian logic in interaction with similar embedded in A, resulting in this story, allows the building up of characters that are constantly interacting with an ‘I’ that is simply taking position on different matters arising. Appear thus the ‘dialogues’: ‘I’ in conversation with ‘Hannah’ on financial matters, ‘I’ in conversation with ‘Natasha’ on matters of international security, ‘I’ in conversation with ‘Athens’ on political maters, etc.

Like the main character of Stefan’s Zweig ‘Die Schachnovelle’, I use to play chess with myself. This allows the construction of hypothesis: Natasha is going to think this way and that way and I think this way and that way. If ‘x’ happens, what is going to do Natasha and what am I going to do myself? Time passing, more complicated ‘hypothesis’, involving more and more ‘characters’ are thought of and this involving every time more complicated matters.

This peculiar activity of mine seems to be affecting somehow reality by means I can’t establish. In my village family ‘Karalis’ represents Russia. Whenever Russia is involved in one of my hypothesis, I have a look at what these people are doing that day. I insert these observations into my scheme and can say that results are satisfactory. What is Russia going to do if there is war in Middle Orients? No Karalis appears. Russia is not going to intervene.

These intuitive conclusions have no rational consistency. But seem to fit general patterns and schemes and to actually really correspond to something. I’m used to work this way. I wouldn’t pretend it affects more general situations.

This is how things are in 2003 when I’m supposed to go to ‘verify’, at the same time that I have to visit Jerusalem a third time. And happens what should never have happened: it looks as if some ‘hypothesis’ were really taking place. How?

Take an example: You sit down beside ‘x’ and start thinking ‘how boring life is and really, what are we up to and there is no meaning anywhere’. You say: “These thoughts derive from the interaction with ‘x’ that has inspired them.” These thoughts have a mark, a character. And you say: “If ‘x’ thinks this way, it must be a person thinking generally this and that and reacting this way and that way and ordering reality this way.” This makes a ‘character’ you call Wilheim, to say, and fits a general situation in a determined way.

Wilheim is a general character that moves quite freely inside of my mind. Whenever the situation allows it to happen, Wilheim is asked for her opinion on this and that matter, and acts one way or the other.

You can get this character without having sit down beside anyone. It is a different character. X in Telalim is someone who is refered to an empirical reality. This empirical reality has made a character inside of a general frame. If the general frame has these characteristics, then there must be other ‘x’ more or less that way. If x in Telalim has an empirical source, Wilheim is a derived character that is born out of the derivation of a general frame out of the specific x in Telalim.

I don’t sit down beside Wilheim. Thus wilheim is not inside of a kibbutz with ostriches. It is character grouping perhaps around 20.000 people with similar characteristics that may be at the same time in a jewelry, a bakery or in an office. With variables: one is married, the other isn’t, one has children, the other hasn’t, one has higher studies, the other hasn’t. The synthesis of all these possibilities allows the figuring out of a configuration that represents the whole logic in one individual having a specific life.

Wilheim, the synthesis of all those people, has a cat and two children, a boy and a girl. Worried about the death of the austronaut of the Challenger, she starts asking herself if there is eternal life. And concludes that if a body dies, the ‘character’, the ‘identity’ of the one, does never die. Consequently, she says to herself, the one who died, must be somewhere, were it in the synthesis of different elements that are to be found in different people.

I’m observing what my character is developping as fundamental theory and start laughing. “Well,” I say, “Then synthesize all the elements and put them into a benjaminite type. But you have to eliminate the causes of death, otherwise the same will happen again.” It gives birth to the Challenger hypothesis, where the one who ‘died’ is found by soldiers at the borders of Israel as having escaped death. Actually, the ‘psychic type’, the identity of the one, who is kept by Wilheim and two soldiers. (Challenger hypothesis: Manual of a soldier) If the one, without socks (in the awareness of not having done anything – game with happenings in Paris-Jerusalem where the fact of buying socks implies ‘you have done everything’) manages to escape the guards and to arrive to Wilheim’s house, he has escaped the causes of death and can live. But: this ‘theory’ has no place in actual society and the man must leave. You can’t hide him away more: he’s hunted by contemporary blocks of thought. And Wilheim’s son says: “It’s not worth the while living if we can’t give shelter to the man without socks.”

This is a story, a codification of interactions that has actually nothing to do with empirical reality. Perhaps it affects ways of thinking but it is obvious that no austronaut has landed accidentally at the borders of Israel.

Problem 1: Wilheim exists and really has a cat and at least a son. Can I presume that my story is ‘true’? No. It has coded probably a way of being that allows the presumption this person may be acting in a determined way in a given situation.

Problem 2: What happens with other ‘hypothesis’ linked to the transfer of information of national importance from Israel to Russia? From my point of view it is a ’story’, too, an intellectual exercise that tries solving a problem inside of given coordinates. It was really funny, the story.

But there is a ’tilt’. Wilheim is a derived synthesesized character whose origin is someone I really know in Telalim. The ‘transfer’ hypothesis arises from a ‘folder’ that is categorized as ‘electronic signal in code’. I don’t know where these informations come from but I have called them this way as I can’t understand where they come from. The most absurd things can be found in this folder reason why I usually get information out of there in order to make ‘jokes’. There are: mars men, speaking monkeys, coming back to life people old 300.000 years, etc. I would say a ‘n’importe quoi’ in general and in particular that is though very useful in order to make a mars woman enter a police station in a given situation. I really think it is very funny but don’t use to give a lot of importance to the whole.

What happens though with the information of transfer which, as far as I can evaluate, affects weak military border points?

Sask is a general military type derived of coordinates I have developped to determine the identity of one of those youth companions that have gone lost in the depth of the unconscious. There is ‘Sask’, a real one, probably, and the a multiplicity of Sask’s, that have positions in psychiatry, in Intelligence, in weapon construction, in army strategy. Usually a quite unhappy work maniac it tends to want to control the world through formal electronical coordinates. In psychiatry this gives a type who has made a program defining people according to characteristics and compatible characters through the finding of a certain number of similar features. In Israel, poor people are married through a newly developped program. That has by the way forgotten to include the developpers of the program into it.

This is a ‘extra polación’ = the character is left free to organize a society inside of its own way of understanding and this results in a few absurd situations that make me though laugh very much (solution of the homosexual problem in the army in ‘Manual of a soldier’).

Usually, I tend to answer to these possibilities by pushing a situation against this logical structure in such ways that it restores balances (The soldier in prison of ‘Manual of a soldier’) and this in lower lines (sexual interaction) because I have stated that a surprising happening of this nature corresponding accidentally to given structures of understanding affects immediately these and breaks the mechanism of a logic.

Inside of  a general structure where a Sask type is ‘common’, you just put a soldier into prison after having had a general lieutnant make experimentations to test homosexuality and … a document transfer becomes possible in theory if and only if, Sask type A is married to B.

How many chances are there a Sask type A is married to B? That must be a type homosexual repressed in lines m of mm? 1 out of 2 thousand, let us say. But it is possible.

Wilheim is there. It is possible to build up a situation in which the solution of my hypothesis is inserted, just in case. And it happens.

For the first time in over 10 years, a situation, an outer reality has a scheme that may allow attaching to it the character of ‘real’ without doubt and inside of a … hypothesis. It is true.

This point of attachment to reality forms the first synthesis of reality in interaction with the outer world in over 10 years and will allow to establish now the relationship between the whole rest of hypothesis, constructions and imaginations and the world.

And this, this is more than dangerous. Independenty of what I’m doing really, I’m to an environment nothing but a little shepherd who is robbing out people of cheese secrets. My known social reality has nothing to do with international transfers of information on whatever that affects nationl and international security. Even if I were who I’m, thing known by one alone, it has little to do with bombs.

Perhaps I’m furious because of exactly that: how is it ever possible that these matters finish by affecting little shepherds or wheat dealers? I grasp intuitively the coordinates of the situation and blame ‘Sask’ for the happening on personal basis. I wouldn’t shoot her but I will induce a dry one night stand - it’s the same patterns I use to work in and seem to restablish balances. Actually: I’m getting rid of an anger and move logics around that allow I actually get rid of it.

Second fact. It really seems to be affecting reality. The day I see Sask arriving with a companion I just get lost inside of my seat. A Sask type is not Sask and this is Sask. Poor Sask.

Second point of attachment. The restoration of balances on inner parameters has had as effect that Sask arrives with a nice handsome boy. Homosexual, perhaps. The ‘Minja’ hypothesis is developped in order to create a situation where Sask is menaced by possible blackmail in order to bar all possibility all this may not happen again. I don’t believe is actually happened, or at least not exactly this way.

I have the feeling something changes. And this implies that a hypothesis enters a variable. Why? The structure of the happening in En Kareim as far as I can reconstruct it implies a change in Sask type A that seems to start leaning on a virtual Sask type I had developped in Greece. Two types have fused probably accidentally.

To give an image: A couple logic in image is nothing but a structure of action on inner parameters. A man manages the outer world and a woman her home (type a). Implies: the psychic reality is ordered in one area and the understanding reality is ordering another in the best of cases, as resulting of the inner order, with variables. Thus: I feel this is wrong (psychic reality) and decide to leave (determination in understanding). In general strategies, this implies there is an inner parameter of judgement (notion) that is used as reference in order to structure outer reality. (For example: reliability as means to hire someone if and only if  formal criteria are fulfilled). In justice this implies that there are objective proves and criteria of reliability for a witness.

This is the general reality pattern I’m moving inside. With this small inconvenience that I can’t see what is of formal, objective or structuring reality. I guess it must be there, but I can’t see it.

Consequently I derive the irrational from patterns as deviating from the original pattern. And this as I hold mine for deeply rational. Consequently I presume that this situation is only possible inside of an artificial couple that forms itself for reasons of image where what I would call strict order is ‘accompanied’ by an irrational element moving in autonomous and independent way. In justice this implies that ‘you presume I’m guilty without proves and not having means to stop me, put in functioning a plan b, where I’m trapped accidentally and shot because I’m resisting myself to authority’.

Exactly what happens, accidentally: the plan b as deriving from a determined configuration is put into functioning because a hypothesis has just entered reality. Instead of being parts of a deliberate mechanism, it is bad consciousness that pushes R to a series of measures that should lead to the same result than if it were a mechanism.

The way plan ‘b’ fits into other hypothesis, establishes the link between whatever and reality.

But it becomes obvious: R has charged himself effectively of the ‘obscure’ aspect of Sask and this has produced a repartition of tasks where the ‘male’ is acting out of inner impulses, while the ‘female’ keeps strictest order in appearance.

This change produces the death of the German agent which would probably have never happened otherwise.

I conclude that R is very useful for the time being.

But this all implies that Sask is going to find who is at the origin of the blackmail almost immediately. A confusion in lines leads Sask to Federman, while I continue looking out of the window as if nothing had happened and this is probably the interaction that is recorded by Minja.

There is no need of black mailing anymore: the fusion of Sask types due to the constant coming and going of information has solved the problem all alone by itself or almost.

The bomb that is there and apparently the object of all covet is the result of a former logic that has changed now accidentally due to  a certain number of interactions.

I think: this bomb is dangerous and even to make it disappear you need Sask who is the only one who may disactivate it. Is it possible to convince Sask of this if you change a bomb for another that may be less dangerous but as convincing, finally? It’s obvious that Sask is not going to leave the bomb like that.

I have been working at a male Sask character, who is a little bit dull but very funny finally, as compatible character with my own in a more general frame of hypothesis. In  a fusion of Sasks, it seems as if inside of the configuration ff in low lines, mf in middle lines and mm in upper lines, Sask would be willing to change a bomb for another.

I have changed myself. I’m not inside of a general hypothetical frame anymore. I have a ’something’ that allows the synthesis of reality, although this implies an enormous work due to the extremely high amount of hypothesis I had been amusing myself with.

Hypothetically, I was nothing. Keeping  a referential female type in the way to organize reality, I shift the ‘I’ from a male type to a female in variables of ff, mf or mm with extreme easiness. Well, I say, patterns of reason are kept in a notion of emotional balance and if it is possible to induce those through an image as this peculiar person does seem to understand this way, I must be a female in wings mm, if a bomb is ‘child’ or product in mf in order to impress a lover in ff.

This is a temporary fixation of identity inside of an almost irreal situation where due to the entering of a hypothesis into reality, a symbiotic fusion has been split in two and a fusion of two types of which one virtual has happened inside of an almost unbelievable cascade of happenings of different nature.

It’s rather not determining, I would say, but seems to generate a solution.

Quite enchanted with my new role for a while, I plunge into the possible characteristics of an f in mm and will structure my reality inside of this for a few years to come. This is: a woman (physically) whose psychic disposition (f) is the one of a homosexual man in wings female.

This ‘x’ I would rather not immediately associate to myself, seems to show a rational balance in interaction with a type whose structures of understanding are determined by accident (gun powder configuration) in lines mm. As I determine the psychic disposition, Sask determines the structure of understanding and is thus a ‘male’ in mm, who needs a proper social environment. Sask is a repressed m in mm who submits to heavy moral patterns and is thus intuitively horrified, as much as Vodianova, by the way, by the marriage of male among them. In order to have an adequate social environment ‘he’ needs a woman (Leya) while keeping affective, chaste links to a female mm, who warrants for the emotional stability. Is this so, then the bomb will change its nature a little after.

Considered as somewhat absurd insertion of formal solutions into reality it seems to be the only temporary solution. Categorized as ‘exception in utter need’ it is framed inside of a realm where this is still possible, the ‘Varonen von Speth und zu Schülzburg’ Empire where exceptions are possible inside of a more general agreement.

Logically Sask is transfered to Germany into a virtual internet world where this Empire has a local existence.

The very careful study of average types in the environment as the Gazit type and the so called fiscal type allows thinking an agreement has been obtained.

Very well, you can say that a problem may have found a solution. It has introduced a six wings logic into the formal patterns of someone whose general patterns have been fixed in outer image and accidentally in lines mm. What is Sask? I don’t know and actually I don’t care. If I judge by what I see as much nothing as myself but needing of a fixed outer image as regulator, thing I don’t need.

I, my poor I, starting to get back synthesis on outer reality starts a reconstruction of what there is and was on basis f of mm, inside of a hypthesis where I’m the third part of a puzzle, including bombs as possible material realization of a life project.

The very quick reconstruction of the past with as many data as possible inside of this new identity, results in the shocking awareness of the fact that I have in my hands information enough so as to put an end to the Bundesrepublik and the Republique Francaise, which is completely out of proportion in consideration of my actual social situation. I know that the very fact of knowing something is enough in order to produce an effect: was it not so with the transfer hypothesis? It is moving me to do things that are interacting with reality in such ways that it is affecting general situations. Even if I shut up, what I mean, say, imply, the way I act are inducing such thing in one way or another. Even repressed knowledge interacts with reality, I know that, too and it is obvious that I can not know what I know.

If Sask does makes her new bomb, the finality has to be to make a war. How do you make a war? If there is  a transgression of international law. A transgression of international law. And my war with the Queen of Sabah? Is not resulting of that. But it was just a book and in the best of cases should lead to the establishment of an office getting a tribute of 2 shekel per person a year if anyone liked the idea.

The patterns I’m using are patterns of duel that are transfered to a political image in order to make them appear. Actually a philosophical exercise with possible symbolic consequences, it contains a mean of verification.

Hm.

I have a look at the whole situation and conclude: my ‘Empire’ is the only possible legitime parallel power pole to Germany. If I give two principles to my Empire that are: that international law determines outer interaction and ancestral proves love interactions, then I can translate this into a financial organization that affects political behaviour and thus may avoid a complete collapse, a dictatorship or  a war.

Called the Neu Schwanstein hypothesis it is just the working out of a possibility that seeming very probable at that moment inside of my own insight, may perhaps never occur. Thus, I ask for Neu Schwanstein in exchange for the temporary occupation of a hole in government (without taxes) and close the whole territory, including a few mountains, into walls. Neu Schwanstein develops a financial system deriving of those two principles that inserts itself progressively into the rest of society through a privilex (particular law). Reinforcing the army in a particular law that considers high treason as meriting death, it introduces death penalty again into social life only and only in what is of concern of the army, that has its own ways to determine whether there is or not. Thus, the financial system in interaction with a new financial pole, pushes psychopathetic elements towards the realm of the army and those concretely having characteristics as said of ‘rats’ that are those nazi logics having lead to the third Reich and the abuses of the German agent or group in interaction with the government.

It looked very beautiful and almost like a solution.

As I feel really tired only with the thought of it, I think of pushing the new Sask into the representative role of the Emperor only and only if she manages to make a war respecting absolutely all terms of international law as this, in influence with the German army allows the establishment of clear criteria of what is of war and of high treason.

I was eating peanuts bought with the 2 shekels a person a year in an obscure office in Jerusalem in the meantime.

Very happy with the possibility of a solution that may be of need, I think, in terms of probability 1 to a million, but that should be there just in case, I have to solve the other problem that seems to interest the fiscal much more than the new world configuration: I need to reinforce the hypothesis of the love proof through an example in order to be ready if Sask really makes her war. Actually Sask was wanting to get a divorce through a bomb and the thing is how to get a divorce that may be justified otherwise than through a bomb.

Thus: for all (wings mm, mf or ff) if A determined in these codes and whose name must be somehow present in what I have in my hands now and who I don’t know personally, is found in lines of electronical interaction, then it is true that A does not belong to the present B, and only virtually to another. (I in my or another’s name claim). A reversion: following the patterns of the Song of Songs, love is defined indirectly through the contrary of what appears. If this is not true, than that is.

Of course Spaniards jump into conclusions and legalize homosexual marriage a little after. What you’re marrying now, Frau Fiskalien, are two homosexual men in the impossibility of being as they’re women, so you better don’t take the conclusion as such but just the path of demonstration. It doesn’t marry me to Sask by ancestral means, it proves only that what there was is none. You can say that there is reason in what in reversion results of this proof: if someone is linked to another in positive ways through similar means you can say it is on love whatever it affects.

Sask is very serious and I’m, too. While, in spite of the most decisive opposition of the fiscal and many others I’m trying to get the proof for what I maintain, Sask is working at her bomb and preparing  a war.

The proof is found December 2007. The war starts in January 2009.

There is a case in reality where it is proved that international law reveals if it is not respected, irrationality in behaviour and justifies intervention. It is proved that you can find someone by electronical means in such ways that it found and justify a divorce if conditions are put wisely.

Consequently, I go on developing the hypothesis of the Emperor.

Precisely: something has happened that will have further consequences and I will jump from here to the war and to the proof (2007/2009) while waiting for the response of the State Department to my proposition, because there are missing parts in the puzzle.

You can say that the pushing back of the causes of both agressions in formal, that is to say, in general terms, have produced an accident that is at the origin of the death of X. Inside of this logic (apparently an ff logic in interaction of appearance with mf) it is possible that another accident occurs that may put an end to what was at the formal origin of the second agression.

This inside of a logic that was before I changed the patterns of understanding. It agresses a something that corresponds to the logical compound I call ‘rats’ in variables.

But, my logic has changed. I’m moving now in a separated mm logic. Mm logics build up images. While acting inside of the older logic that allows that I get definitely healed, I stay in an mm logic that will interact with this in ways I can’t evaluate.

I can say now that inside of this general configuration, I get proves for the fact that France is at the origin in principle of the Organ Traffic Mafia as I will state, while being taken to a hospital for psychological evaluation and made around 40 clinical tests that have nothing to do with the matter in question (HUA), thing I hold for sufficient proof for the fact that an intentional killing was planed that could only favour a use of organs if considered that tests are proving how horribly healthy I’m.

Inside of the same pattern, Germany is linked in Guayaquil to the diamond/circon traffic, on which I will fall as accidentally.

Thing proving to my understanding, that: the essential logic leading to the OTM in interaction with an essential logic not wanting to make the difference between circon and diamonds build up a logic that is at the origin of planed massacres of innocent populations.

I may say then, that the French attempt to appropriate itself the German logic allowing through formalism to the structuring of states and the building up of machines, produces a very ill logic that leads to the killing of gipsies around 1936. That French attribute this feature to the German and induce the killing of whoever is killed during second world war as result of the presumption it is the direct consequence of their way of thinking and not of the interaction of both.

This deviation of fault generates a new logic again that produces the reality of the OTM inside of the French Intelligence Headquarters.

I can judge for myself, that the incapability to make the difference in value between a circon and a diamond is the same that does not allow making the difference between a ‘bat’ and a ‘rat’ (German under French influence) and may lead to the total distruction of the population through the fusion of both types (x in Skopje) if measures are not taken quickly.

I will esteem that the Neu Schwanstein solution is  a proper solution for Germany and actually possible but actually prefer to eat peanuts in Jerusalem. Or finish writing my book if those not willing to let me eat peanuts.

At the actual state of things I would think it properly proved that there is no essential psychopathetic behaviour in Germany if not under influence and that a proper financial construction may allow the keeping of balances by itself. Thing not implying I don’t esteem the situation in France as grave if not as very grave.

As Sask has so diligently made a reasonable bomb in exchange for an intelligent one and such a proper war, I would say that the Hypothesis of Neu Schwanstein stays in her hands while I go on eating peanuts.